IRC log started Thu Oct 28 00:00:00 1999 [msg(TUNES)] permlog 1999.1028 -:- Nick [user5884@202.54.33.89] has joined #tunes -:- jose [user5655@202.54.33.89] has joined #tunes hi is there anyone on the line 12:30am -:- SignOff td: #TUNES (td has no reason) -:- jose1 [user2889@202.54.33.89] has joined #tunes -:- jose1 [user2889@202.54.33.89] has left #tunes [] -:- jose [user5655@202.54.33.89] has left #tunes [] -:- SignOff Nick: #TUNES (Leaving) -:- SignOff smkl: #TUNES (bbl) -:- water [water@tnt-9-26.tscnet.net] has joined #tunes I am pregnant with an idea. People around me wonder at my confusion and hypocrisy. I find it difficult to be at peace with my environment lately. But I am in a stage of birthing. I am thinking for two, my brain-child and I. 03:00am Those relating to me via IRC wonder even more that I am so full of conflict, yet invoke Taoist philosophy. In truth, I am a sleeper. "water" is my true name, but I use it because for now I am not it. When the time comes, I will have no need for such a name, because people will look at me and see the water. It has been so before, and it will be again, if the universe is willing. -:- water [water@tnt-9-26.tscnet.net] has left #tunes [] 03:10am -:- Zhivago [brian@th.merddin.com.au] has joined #tunes -:- hcf [nef@me-portland-us821.javanet.com] has joined #tunes -:- smkl [sami@glubimox.yok.utu.fi] has joined #tunes -:- SignOff smkl: #TUNES (Ping timeout for smkl[glubimox.yok.utu.fi]) -:- smkl [sami@glubimox.yok.utu.fi] has joined #tunes -:- Kaufmann [newbie@dial863.infolink.com.br] has joined #tunes Hey guys hey this one is worthy of the topic line... philosophical Jerry Springer: http://www.primenet.com/~benmoss/humor/springer.html read till you weep hmm -:- hcf has changed the topic on channel #tunes to: Free Reflective Computing System || philosophical Jerry Springer 08:40am Anyone want to talk? hmm, what about? 08:50am arrow what should break if i install glibc2.1? your TV set oh wait, that's wrong -:- Kaufmann is now known as KaufmannBRB i haven't got one ... hopefully my roommates tv set didn't break -:- KaufmannBRB is now known as Kaufmann heh 09:00am I'll be back later -:- SignOff Kaufmann: #TUNES (FOO! "Jesus would make a good main character for a Seinfeld spinoff" - Amber) 09:10am -:- binEng [Anders@j141.ryd.student.liu.se] has joined #tunes hi binEng 10:10am hi brb 10:20am -:- SignOff hcf: #TUNES (Leaving) -:- SignOff binEng: #TUNES ( <k!14>) -:- Downix [down@d-gnaps-108.ici.net] has joined #tunes hey 01:20pm hello 01:30pm -:- hcf [nef@me-portland-us345.javanet.com] has joined #tunes -:- eihrul [lee@usr5-ppp67.lvdi.net] has joined #tunes abi: seen core core was last seen on IRC 2 days, 5 hours, 25 seconds ago, saying: hm, well, i'll be back :) you have a good day :) [Tue Oct 26 10:10:49 1999] 03:20pm !asimov.openprojects.net!! Received :devlin.openprojects.net SERVER irc.linux.com from devlin.openprojects.net !?! hey, this is all beging logged now? what is? the irc channel yes TUNES logs it 04:00pm cool it is updated realtime hmm looking at the OS review subproject too bad it's not indexed hello log file 8) 04:10pm water will read the log if you say something interesting nothing interesting to say right now other than figuring out my OS requirements like how hard is it for an OS to deal with up to 4 video pixel depths at once? at once? what do you mean? I mean top layer running at 16-color (for icons) next at 256-bit (for deeper functions) and possibly a layer for 16-bit and 24-bit color wouldn't that be windowing systems work? just curious anyway, in X, you can have programs running on different depths 04:30pm -:- lar1 [LarMan@dialup-209.245.134.185.SanJose1.Level3.net] has joined #tunes Hey hey -:- lucag [lucag@wagner.maps.susx.ac.uk] has joined #tunes 04:40pm -:- lucag [lucag@wagner.maps.susx.ac.uk] has left #tunes [] bbl -:- SignOff lar1: #TUNES (Leaving) 05:20pm -:- water [water@tnt-10-107.tscnet.net] has joined #tunes hey water hey hey well, it's really nice to be berated in front of the entire mlist by a stodgy academic :( the shapiro phd guy? yeah * eihrul/#tunes pictures Bjarne Stroustrup whenever he sees his postings. i don't quite know why :) not familiar with his style you don't know who bjarne stroustrup is? i know who he is (c++) i just have no idea what he's like well, i said that jokingly, and you didn't take it as such :) sorry, i have no idea what the joke was about it was vague and ill-formed 05:30pm shapj got himself slashdotted smkl: how so? -:- Closing Link: TUNES[bespin.dhs.org] by king.openprojects.net (Ping timeout for TUNES[bespin.dhs.org]) -:- Connection closed from irc.us.openprojects.net: Success -:- Use /Server to connect to a server -:- Connecting to port 6667 of server irc.us.openprojects.net [refnum 0] -:- BitchX+Deb1an: For more information about BitchX type /about -:- Welcome to the Internet Relay Network TUNES (from lucas.openprojects.net) -:- Your host is lucas.openprojects.net, running version u2.10.05.18.(ipcheck4-5) (from lucas.openprojects.net) -:- This server was cobbled together Wed Apr 28 1999 at 12 02:19 EDT(from lucas.openprojects.net) -:- lucas.openprojects.net u2.10.05.18.(ipcheck4-5) dioswkfcg biklmnopstv -:- [local users on irc(5)] 1% -:- [global users on irc(249)] 43% -:- [invisible users on irc(336)] 57% -:- [ircops on irc(12)] 2% -:- [total users on irc(585)] -:- [unknown connections(0)] -:- [total servers on irc(32)] (avg. 18 users per server) -:- [total channels created(153)] (avg. 3 users per channel) !lucas.openprojects.net Highest connection count: 9 (8 clients) !lucas.openprojects.net Welcome to Open Projects! You are on 2 ca 2(2) ft 14(14). -:- Mode change [+f] for user TUNES -:- Mode change [+iws] for user TUNES -:- JOIN activated by "TUNES #tunes tunes@bespin.dhs.org " -:- TUNES [tunes@bespin.dhs.org] has joined #tunes -:- [Users(#tunes:8)] [ TUNES ] [ water ] [ eihrul ] [ hcf ] [ Downix ] [ Fare ] [ Zhivago ] [ smkl ] -:- Channel #tunes was created at Sun Feb 28 08:48:06 1999 -:- BitchX+Deb1an: Join to #tunes was synced in 6.587 secs!! -:- Mode change [-s] for user TUNES he worked on eros? or rather is? i guess i'm asking about what "slashdotted" means. thousands of slashdot readers visit your site at once -:- abi [nef@bespin.dhs.org] has joined #tunes and off or 'slashdot' your web server er.. ok .......................LOGFILE 1999.1028 tis not malicious, just due to the high quantity of hits the site draws why'd they do that to him? oh slashdot gets well over a million reads per day IIRC yup it is the largest pure internet news org out there if they post a link to your site, five minutes later, it'll be down :) not true 7 minutes, at least 8) not completely true but generally heh if your system can't handle it it weeds out those junk servers in seconds 05:40pm slashdot is a heavy resource tho * eihrul/#tunes slams his head. it does not want to grok formalisms today without pain sorry ti hear ut hehe sorry to hear it * water/#tunes tries to figure out how to improve his relationship with people. well, i mean physical pain, as in migraines ow your writing is steadily improving :) though the migraines aren't helping my thought process maybe if /. gets popular enough, it should mirror sites that it references on its own servers a bit drastic, but maybe necessary some day water: Suggest it me? post to /.? sure um no thanks !irq:*! any axur people here? want me to? would you? !wichert:*! axur? wazzat? sure thanks let me finish tinkering with magic * water/#tunes sighs in relief 05:50pm i would just hate the possibility that i would get involved in slashdot discussion it scares me why? nah, it's fun yeah, but i wouldn't handle it well * Downix/#tunes has done it, even been granted a "beneficial post" back a few times come on the waters fine, jump on in! sorry, getting rebuked by shapiro has really make me think s/make/made hehe what were you rebuked about? childishness, i suppose ok so, what does everyone think about IBM dumping the PC line finally? * water/#tunes hides and what new evil did they replace it with? or did they not? they did not IBM is officially, entirely, and forever out of the PC business they stated what business are they in then? same as they always were, workstations, servers, supercomputers and mainframes with the power series of chips, i guess doh, forgot about those :) I'd wager so water: what is the notion of 'returning'? where do the returned arrows go? well, they don't really go anywhere the context travels to them, i guess but i haven't worked that out yet not precisely, anyway i almost see two paths maintained by arrow 06:00pm how so? * eihrul/#tunes is trying to think of an adequate word for the second path... i guess a progress and a state hmm something that says to apply G to X and then something storing X and eventually the resultant Y which is very analogous to a program :) well, in a persistent store, since Y=G(X), Y constitutes redundant information constructed from X and G oh sure that reminds me of 'exploring logical dynamics' where modes and projections transform programs to statements and vice versa er.. switch that :) * water/#tunes composes some email for the mlist i'll have to address that aspect of arrow at some point, but not just yet so how would you represent applying the G to X? probably a selection made by an arrow i know, it's cheesy, but it's the most precise thing i can say just now {G, X}? sure but what context it fits into, i'm not sure 06:10pm * eihrul/#tunes ponders. no! eh? you got something against me pondering? no migraines for you :) now what happens if X is the result an application.... then you apply an application to a function just like in lisp (this isn't a final answer) so X wouldn't be directly pointed to but rather the {G, Z} that causes it... ? but if X is the function application, then you're directly referring to it ok.... you could abstract the function application as a symbol, but i don't have a formal framework for it * eihrul/#tunes has a mental picture of a list of such arrows specifying applications. ok wherein an application possibly points to a previous application as its inputs yeah, that's higher-order functional thinking that almost seems like a syntax tree to me well, it's trivial syntax, just like lisp hopefully, i can formalize infinite-sized structures of that kind as well to work with non-computable things -:- SignOff hcf: #TUNES (Ping timeout for hcf[me-portland-us345.javanet.com]) 06:20pm -:- Chazfh [don_tmailm@2Cust120.tnt1.stl1.da.uu.net] has joined #tunes i just recompiled my kernel for the first time to get sound support and it works but when it plays a sound file wierd noises come out of my speakers instead of the sound file i played? and one got any advice? hmm, not sure 06:40pm -:- Chazfh [don_tmailm@2Cust120.tnt1.stl1.da.uu.net] has left #tunes [] water: umm, wow... i didn't see this new shapj post before m so you are both schizophrenic and responsibility-phobic cumulatively :) that again was a vague joke for the humor impaired i doubt anyone will defend me 06:50pm i just sent out some arrow explanations on mlist? i don't think that replying to the prof will help me or tunes in any way yes very correct retaliation would give him more reason to belittle you unless it is polite :) i really hate adults someday, i'd like to overturn society not violently, but... even revolutions seeking peaceful ends don't happen peacefully well, i meant physical violence yes, revolutions have lots of that... driving people crazy by presenting them ideas can possibly obviate the need for bloodshed i use 'crazy' loosely i don't think there is any way to overturn conservative (capitalism) well, i have hopes world wide depression could do it and some revolutions don't need violence at all, except as the old powers are strangled by their own inflexibility -:- hcf [nef@me-portland-us343.javanet.com] has joined #tunes * eihrul/#tunes ponders: "The Glorious Revolution" of England good example of that :) heh 07:00pm * water/#tunes sighs -:- air [brand@p0wer.qzx.com] has joined #tunes i'm just depressed now from? shapiro's condescention er.. s/t/s 07:10pm that in itself was a little bit harsh well, that's your opinion the rest of tunes might not think so and Fare has been known to kow-tow excessively to Shapiro * eihrul/#tunes hasn't known Fare to do much of anything. just notice how he responds to shapiro compared to how he responds to others :P i can't ignore it 07:20pm did not say to yeah, but there's a fine line for me between ignoring and replying perhaps the best i can really do is to try not to reply no... you just need to do so with patience and courtesy which i don't have i'm like a mother in late-term pregnancy i have this incredible idea which i can't share yet with just anyone i didn't have it either until my ego got bruised by the repurcussions thereof when was that? not too long ago on the mlist? no oh not that recently i just lurk on the mlist 07:30pm damn, i wrote too much in my last post the worst that can happen is that it unintentionally answers someone else's questions :) i just hope i don't turn people off by sounding too enthusiastic that's not what's turning people off it is the rabidness you sometimes use to that end ugh why must the one with this idea be the one who is so mal-adjusted? intelligence is a reaction? maybe maybe i just have to be clever to get people to like me darn it, that sounds too plausible no, just reflective heh model other people through yourself, golden rule :) other people definitely don't want what i do 07:40pm i did not mean it in quite that way i know, but it is still true my psychology seems very alien to most people i meant it in the sense that you do not like professors discrediting your ideas harshly nor do they like to be discredited harshly hm how did i discredit him, then? or try not shapiro or appear to oh but i don't discredit, i offer a paradigm no offense, but you do use some instances of the word "idiot" oh, you're not talking about prof's, you're talking about tunesers * eihrul/#tunes nods. they do no research!!! they don't look at what's there sorry, it drives me crazy they look at 'pop' comp sci issues and ignore the unpopular things heh... 'pop' computer science culture most of them are computer scientists though :) not imo i see lots of 'comp sci' books that are for users of development tools "here's what you get. comp sci is what you make of it." and that comp sci seems way too deeply rooted in arbitrary useless issues for useless ideas they do get use out of them but nothing like what we want for tunes 07:50pm -:- SignOff hcf: #TUNES (Leaving) bleh... well, i'll be afk for a little while -:- SignOff eihrul: #TUNES (Ping timeout for eihrul[usr5-ppp67.lvdi.net]) -:- SignOff Zhivago: #TUNES (Leaving) hm 08:10pm -:- Zhivago [brian@th.merddin.com.au] has joined #tunes water: heh, I read your rant. water: you neglect the flip side of that though what's that? you've produced nothing with arrows yourself. so shoot me * Zhivago/#tunes shoots water. * water/#tunes keels over dead. Its one thing to have a crackpot idea, and then produce something. ah! much better. its another to have a crackpot idea, and produce nothing. yeah, well, my specs posts will help change that however, it is unbecoming to shout and rant and rave about people who are actually producing things. water: oh good. are you on the mlist? no, I don't think so. I've been disillusioned with tunes for a fair while. well, i am too i knew about it when it began well, a large amoutn of the problem seems to be that most of the active people are highschool kids. about 5 years ago but i only joined a year ago hmm, I saw it a few years back, when I was involved with the lispos lists well, i ahven't actually joined. i am just vocal on the mlists it had relatively similar goals, but no substance. sigh if there were a lispos actually running, it would factor out some noise from tunes and for some reason fare and I could never quite communicate likewise, until recently well, I'm slowly working on it, but I have commercial work to do as well. eating is a convenience I am unwilling to forego heh 08:20pm just wish demoncrat would finish his contract, as he did most of the compiler work and I'm not sure of the cleanest way to raise the instructions. what product are you talking about? water: hmm, vapour. heh the single-space pvm lisp-os. well, i'm trying as hard as i can to take the idea that obsessed me when i was young and make it real heh, likewise. that's all i really want, and no one else seems to want it well, you're incapable of expressing yourself sensibly about it. needs examples. it's because i've been so alone working on it what have you done to test arrow's practicality? sorry, i do really need attention that i don't get (sorry to get personal) mostly the reasoning for the spec, and the smalltalk code it's taken me years just to develop the arrow idea from nothing to something that now almost has substance ok, but why not design a rally really simple system, and represent it arrow style. othewise how can you know if this is actually a useful idea? i *am* water: i work alone on brix and have no problem making others understand it the arrow style is not a programming language oh good :) air: yeah, but brix is a pretty conventional system air: but your idea can be compared with others Zhivago: no it isnt air: wherease arrows is mostly mumbo jumbo at the moment. air: hmm, what's unconventional about it? zhivago: just take some time reading the arrows paper Zhivago: no other OS does what it does air: you have a bunch of protected chunks which talk IPC at each other. zhivago: besides, the paper requires a hell of a lot of theory from mathematics to grok air: well, what's unique to it? Zhivago: uhh, no water: that's why ther's no point reading it. water: give me a system built from arrows, and I'll understand it. zhivago: exactly what i've been working on zhivago: the paper helped me work out ideas zhivago: consider it an open journal water: good :) water: when do you expect to have a system for inspection? hmm abi, brix? brix is at http://www.qzx.com/brix say, the turn of the millenium hmm, that's a long time for a simple system you can't like describe the relationships between dick, jane, and spot? just a couple of months away those relationships are very vague read McCarthy papers? like the one in particular on contexts? air: there was a page on brix describing what it actually did, but it seems to have gone away. water: I think I have, but quite a long time ago. -:- eihrul [lee@usr5-ppp130.lvdi.net] has joined #tunes Zhivago: it was outdated 08:30pm air: ok, so there's nothing describing brix's design zhiv: you want copies of my specs posts? Zhivago: not at this time water: oh, I guess so. brian@designix.com.au ok, the first one is nice and short, and the second is a set of note on it air: ok, well, from my memory it looked like a microkernel system with persistence air: which makes is remarkably similar to eros, only without the page grain caps system it does use soemthing like a uk, but no other uk is like it well, I'm interested :) air: squeak-os? what's the difference, its likely that I missed something in the brief description. eih: not quite yah, squeak-os is better :) er... * water/#tunes hides squeak sucks air: how kind :) atleast that is verifiable with squeak brix is a blackbox AFAIK air: so, what's the brix claim to the unique? Zhivago: ill tell u tomorrow cuz im going to bed now fair enough 08:40pm heh, so much crankiness around got my emails yet? yes, they've arrived, just a moment 08:50pm hmm, your axioms aren't clear hmm > The axiom amounts to: > for each arrow X, there is an arrow in "car" whose car is X and whose cdr >is the arrow referred to by X's car slot, and there is an arrow in "cdr" >with the corresponding definition. tere is an arrow in "car" the car of the arrow X? oops or the car of any arbitrary node? sorry, the car-graph the graph of car's does this mean any car of any node? the car of any arrow or does this mean that we have a car-wise list of arrows ok and nodes are arrows hmm. i must clarify this what is the corresponding definition? because I'm currently drawing such graphs which is what you should be doing :p go ahead Zhivago: inverted? corresponding definition? what do you mean? {X, cdr X} i thought >with the corresponding definition. corresponding to {X, car X}? the q is, what do you mean :) oh just s/"car"/"cdr" and s/car/cdr you use jargonistic language too much oh well * eihrul/#tunes grokked it fine. hmm, so we have a mirror image of X somewhere? i'm broke... who will fix me? water: no-one 09:00pm zhivago: sure about a mirror image of x water: ok, "there is an arrow in 'cdr' ..." of what node? -:- td [x@1Cust115.tnt1.wilmington.nc.da.uu.net] has joined #tunes there is an arrow in "cdr" whose cdr is X and whose car is the arrow referred to by X's cdr slot that's what the corresponding definition was ok, here "cdr" being the cdr of any node again yep sorry, but i got isolated from others when very young, socially speaking and i pre-suppose familiarity with lisp, i guess at least among tunesers well, the revised version is a bit more legible and i messed up that corresponding definition eh, so now its not {cdr X, X}? :) the references in car-graph and cdr-graph both should point away from the arrow in question so {X, cdr X}? yeah that's what i said originally :) {X, car X} and {X, cdr X} 09:10pm oops sorry water: I know lisp well. water: its just that you tend to be mangling terms somewhat :) yeah, well 'head' and 'tail' don't work first and rest do and 0 and 1 aren't very good either but car/cdr is fine its just when you use "car" to refer to a random car :) 'rest' assumes too much oh well, that's why i call it arrow and not lisp+ http://203.21.132.200/arrow1.jpg can you confirm this graph against the first axiom? sure just to make sure that what we think we're talking about this time is what we're talking about without accidental 'grokkings' to confuse things * water/#tunes waits for the image to load and then I must go to my office. yep. that's it good. of course, it ain't the graphs but the process is right I don't care about that, I just want to have a clear definition of the silly axiom graphs are much better than jargonistic bad language ;p silly? well, the new version ain't so silly well, it was phrased so that it had to be corrected/re-interpreted about three times before it was communicatinfg which is silly :) anyhow, I'm away for a bit * eihrul/#tunes can't grok that picture for some reason. yeah, well, it'd be great to be able to talk to someone in person intelligently about this eih: the upper-left cons cell is X * eihrul/#tunes doesn't think graphically. the cells below and to the right are 'car X' and 'cdr X' 09:20pm the extra cells are the reified references * water/#tunes hates being such a terrible communicator okay, i grok the picture, but i like the jargon better :) wow perhaps it was the horizontal representation of arrows i picture them vertically hm er orientated as such ei: except that you got the jargon backward :) ei: which is the problem I have, its all so ambigiously phrased -:- air has changed the topic on channel #tunes to: you might be ugly but that doesnt mean yer kid has to http://www.ronsangels.com/ well, i'm fixing that now good :) Zhivago: i thought the axioms were clear 'nuff :) simple is good, little words are better than big ei: yeah, but it didn't stop you getting the correspondible bit backward. no i didn't get it backwards read the logs :) the log isn't long enough 09:30pm you said to swap car and cdr to get the corresponding one zhiv: on the tunes site Zhivago: water said that yes, which was wrong ok, well, in any case it was ambigious :p :) it's "bash water" day, it seems i guess i deserve it Zhivago: eh... you have to think in terms of car and cdr but i hate being depressed as i am ei: I do. a map from cdr X to X doesn't reasonably represent cdr water; yes, you deserve it. but X to cdr X does :) eih: wate'rs system isn't reasonable ei: so that' s abad argument :) ei: you have to remember that water isa deranged maniac, and we can't expect anything reasonable from him. either that or you're lazy :) zhiv: it's what i am, and i refuse to be sorry for it water: I didn't ask you to be sory. zhiv: i know water: however, it just means taht we need to make exactly sure of what you're actually saying. water: so I think its best to assume that you're insane :) and then communication will be clearer :) well, if i had intelligent people who would discuss this with me in person, i wouldn't need irc or tunes intelligent people are geographically sparse intelligent people interested in this kind of stuff are even sparser :) and now I must physically away don't i know it i need an upper some adrenalin or seratonin brb downers would probably be better as depressed as i am? the uppers will just make you feel worse when they wear off yeah i guess they do whereas if you compare your state of mind on the downers to that as it is unaided afterward, you'll know that you can always feel worse :) heh 09:40pm -:- water is now known as water_afk /nick water -:- water_afk is now known as water 10:10pm -:- Tril [dem@bespin.dhs.org] has joined #TUNES -:- mode/#tunes [+o Tril] by ChanServ hey tril -:- SignOff water: #TUNES (Leaving) -:- water [water@tnt-10-107.tscnet.net] has joined #tunes hi I'm catching up on mlist it seems i've been quite berated today or some of it havent got to today yet i am about to post much-needed rev's to my 'specs' post and oh yes, that's specs for the vm coo i think that Prof. Shapiro has no respect for me whatsoever but then, neither does Fare it seems what have you been up to? water: well, if you can't be understood, why would you get respect? zhiv: i dunno. maybe they could understand that i speak a different language zhiv: and that i am trying as best i can a, soo ka. moshimo boku wa gaikokugo o hanshite iru, anata ga boku o wakarimasu? i think that i can be understood, but it takes time and effort no, not japanese dakara, anata wa boku ga ii na hito to omou? boku soo omanai. chotto hen na kangaetta koto ne? * water/#tunes pulls out the '45 do you respect me for speaking in a foreign language? yes, if you don't have a choice but you do i don't seem to my mind owrks differently no, I think you're just too enamoured of jargon jargon is a dangerous tool well, like i said, my mind owrks differently people use it to exclude others, while raising themselves. i might consider your terms to be jargon as well if you ask me, I can explain anything without jargon and often do like "typing" and "object" would you like to to explain these terms to you? most programming terms are complete bullshit concepts you can't sure I can. because the notions are meaningless to me I've done it on a number of occasions well, that's your choice. 10:30pm you won't wind up with effective communication no, it's a choice i can't make I suggest you go and lock yourself up in your little tower, and go on moaning about how weird your brain is, and how no-one respects you i've tried geez and in the mean-time, I'll go and do something useful give me a chance you're the one taking your chances away you cut yourself off with all this bullshit. thanks for rhetoric you can speak english, and you can understand graphs tril: you there? heh you could undersatnd what typing, or object meant if you want to, and you probably do in any acse and you're just trying to make a falacious point yeag zhiv: i grok luca cardelli's work on types, yet i don't think the type notion is valid so, if you want to communicate stop moaning about how magical your head is, and work on communicating, or stop complaining. zhiv: does that make sense to you? water: no, that's the essence of jargonistic crap :) tril: sorry to bother water: appear to authority :) water: appeal even huh? what's the essence of ...? water: instead of you saying anything yourself, you say 'I didn't agree with this other system' *what* is the essence of ...? water: appeal to authority is :) but i don't disagree that's my point water: well, then you need to say what you think is invalid about the type notion. well, it's a formal theory, so my arguments aren't about validity within it's own system darn brb you don't have an argument yet. you don't *see* it yet you havent' state any argument yet -:- SignOff air: #TUNES (BRiX [http://www.qzx.com/brix] :: sleep) iduh you've just obliquely talked about your argument, without actually presenting it so, state an argument. thesis, I'll happily do antithesis, and lets see what synthesis evolves. my argument is that the human mind using the notion of type creates more noise than otherwise based on what evidence? zhiv: quite patronizing, you jerk water: well, if you werent' such a whinger, I wouldn't need to patronise you the evidence depends on our agreed definition of type which you have not yet attempted to provide 10:40pm if it's a one-place predicate, then we run into inconsistencies gimme a sec to get to it!!! what if it is a simple categoriser? as in formal category theory or something else? lets just talk about real things. "real things" what does a "type of thing" mean. it means a way to categorise ie, we have "egg type things" but categories are hierarchies usually what is this thing? it is an egg. that's the predicate notion of type it satisfies the egg category well, not necessarily why not? it can also be an oblate sphereoid type or it can be a white type how do you express that formally? or it can be a shell type, or a calcium type it sounds like predicates evaluated over objects well, we must look at the acceptance criteria for a given entity into a given category i.e. a formula? but this doesn't imply heirarchies. ok i agree about not implying hierarchies necessarily a formula is one way to do this. so, why do you think that categorising objects makes people's brains noisier? but formulas do promote hierarchies (multiple ones within a type theory) i'm getting to that... that's because of elaboration and subdivision within a category i.e. refining a formula well, being able to differentiate between brown eggs and white eggs which relates to intuitionist logic we don't need to think of this as heirarchical either, we can consider this as the intersection of several categories and intuitionist logic results in redundant information obtained unless you allow "hacks" to violate the intuitionist structure ever studies categories? i mean category theory? not formally, I'm not a mathematician it applies to cs haskell employs some of its notions what is wrong with redundant information? redundant info = noise no, redundant information is not noise noise is irrelevent information tril? care to interject? redundant information reduces noise irrelevant info is redundant info that's its point no, irrelevent info is not redundant, its just information we aren't interested in right now redudant information means multiple representations of the same info not exactly then clarify your point darn it i don't want to continue that's because you're argument is broken i need to work on the arrow spec a handy excuse off you go no, my argument is just not interesting to me off you go then :) well, it isn't i don't argue for the sake of arguing... that's noise read up on category theory for comp. scientists heh, what's interesting is that you run away just as you make an indefensible point it's interesting and then appeal to authority. which is characteristic of what I've seen of your work so far seriously, it's an interesting alternative to type theory 10:50pm and probably a good reason why you aren't getting much respect no, you're too aggressive which bothers me a lot I'm to aggressive because I ask you to justify a point which I consider to be incorrect? ie, claiming that redundancy == noise? no, because you stress me by interjecting with criticism of my thinking patterns sorry if i contradicted an authority :) * water/#tunes pays his respects to shannon well, if they yield things which seem to be incorrect, then you may want to consider the causes. well, type theory is just predicate theory bravado, which flies in the face of godel's theorem on incompleteness water: what does that have to do with what we were talking about? what were we talking about? i shuold revert to calling my types "spaces"to differentiate from those types yuou mean... what was the type of our conversation? :) a little while ago we were talking about what typing actually means in the real world. water: a stupid one by the looks. no we weren't water: that's what I was talking about, what were you talking about? i don't know :) it depends on your perspective, which i don't have ok, then it sounds like 'stupid conversation' is the best type for it zhiv: your fault water: its my fault because you didn't know what you were talking about? no -:- icky [prawn@ns.abtgroup.com.au] has joined #Tunes hey dudes =) water: then you'd better explain yourself :) wow. you're really into this crap 'lo ucky water: I'm hoping to get you to communicate sensibly i'd bet you think language means something water: since that's what you spend most of your time whinging about water: of course language means something i'd bet you think that there aren't concepts that you can't think of water: oh dear, you're a post-modernist, then? oh no!!!! water: what does a concept mean? post-modernists should be shot, of course :) zhiv: exactly wateR: ok, so now you're just deciding to second guess me, rather than trying to talk sensibly. * icky/#Tunes feels in whack water: there are concepts that I can't think of NOW. But given infinite time they can be thought water: why are you wasting time? tril: nope the problem is this. zhiv: because i am lonely thinking is an expression of state transition. zhiv: it's better than shooting myself the state transitions are limited lol which gives limited thoughts over a finite number of state transitions are they? water: yes really? you've got the whole thought process mapped out then water: no, this is simple causality. well, i guess the ai fellows better learna thing or two from you water: you don't understand what I'm talking about, do you? * icky/#Tunes is struggling to get use to which alt keys to use. yes and no 11:00pm Zhivago: your state transition thinking is just as arbitrary a paradigm as a system made of arrows exactly :) really? it has absolutely no meaning thank you tril * water/#tunes shrinks into a corner i give up water: where have i seen you before? water: did you wonder into linuxaus a while ago,.. icky: dunno trill: no icky: yeah, one time brb ok, can we agree that all things we're dealing with have state? why? * water/#tunes reaches for a tranquilizer so that we can talk sensibly zhiv: yeah, why? lol rofl time for me to just leave water: since you don't want to talk sensibly, this probably isn't useful for you Zhivago: what's the state of a machine that is thinking about a state that is unresolvable or incomplete? tril: please check out the arrow stuff water: is new arrow stuff up? not the code docs i'm going to revise the specs tonight i mis-wrote quite considerably again :( but hopefully this next iteration will be much better toodles -:- water [water@tnt-10-107.tscnet.net] has left #tunes [] tril: it doesn't matter what the machine is doing Zhivago: how do you explain intuition tril: it is an experience tril: which is a state so? so, that's my answer to your question if it isn't satisfactory, ask a more intelligent question that "so?" brb back g'day what do we need to talk sensibly about? ummm dusk till dawn I meant zhivago ;P hihi 11:10pm * Tril/#TUNES is away: (afdk) [BX-MsgLog Off] -:- SignOff icky: #TUNES (icky has no reason) tril: whatever we're talking about, hopefully tril: otherwise, what is the point? 'lo icky icky: where abouts in .au are you at? oops, too late :) 11:20pm -:- SignOff Downix: #TUNES (Ping timeout for Downix[d-gnaps-108.ici.net]) [msg(TUNES)] newlog 1999.1029 IRC log ended Fri Oct 29 00:00:00 1999